Difference between revisions of "Scanning Properly"
(→48 Bit Scanning) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Recently, I needed to do a bunch of scanning of old photographs for my wife's mother's memorial. I had always been disatisfied with the totally inadequate performance of my HP d135's scanning capabilities. This soley due to the garbage software it comes with. The windows software is almost worse, and an aftermarket alternative software that I had tried (Art-Scan 5) always seemed to crash things or work funky. | Recently, I needed to do a bunch of scanning of old photographs for my wife's mother's memorial. I had always been disatisfied with the totally inadequate performance of my HP d135's scanning capabilities. This soley due to the garbage software it comes with. The windows software is almost worse, and an aftermarket alternative software that I had tried (Art-Scan 5) always seemed to crash things or work funky. | ||
| − | + | ==New Scanner== | |
So I say, "That's it. I'm buying a new scanner!" I had owned an HP Scanjet scanner in the past, but I had also been really let down by the software, so I decided that HP was out. I knew that Epson had fairly decent software as my scanner at work had that, but it seemed that Epson was really falling behind in the market these days. | So I say, "That's it. I'm buying a new scanner!" I had owned an HP Scanjet scanner in the past, but I had also been really let down by the software, so I decided that HP was out. I knew that Epson had fairly decent software as my scanner at work had that, but it seemed that Epson was really falling behind in the market these days. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
* The product seemed more solid than most others I looked at. | * The product seemed more solid than most others I looked at. | ||
| − | My prayer was that the software would be at least much better than the HP garbage. I was rewarded. I am not claiming that the Canon ScanGear software is the best scanning software in the world, but at least I can say that it is truely useful for REAL world scanning. | + | ==The Software==My prayer was that the software would be at least much better than the HP garbage. I was rewarded. I am not claiming that the Canon ScanGear software is the best scanning software in the world, but at least I can say that it is truely useful for REAL world scanning. |
| − | ==16 Bit | + | ==16 Bit Scan without Scanner Software Levels== |
[[Image:Scan-16bit-image.jpg]]<br><br> | [[Image:Scan-16bit-image.jpg]]<br><br> | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[Image:Scan-16bit-image-fin.jpg]]<br><br> | [[Image:Scan-16bit-image-fin.jpg]]<br><br> | ||
| + | Note that the image has nothing left. Any work from here will degrade the image. | ||
[[Image:Scan-16bit-hist-fin.jpg]] | [[Image:Scan-16bit-hist-fin.jpg]] | ||
| − | ==16 Bit | + | ==16 Bit Scan with Scanner Software Levels== |
[[Image:Scan-16bit-image-adj.jpg]]<br><br> | [[Image:Scan-16bit-image-adj.jpg]]<br><br> | ||
| Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[Image:Scan-16bit-image-adj-fin.jpg]]<br><br> | [[Image:Scan-16bit-image-adj-fin.jpg]]<br><br> | ||
| + | Note how much image is intact compared to not using the scanner adjustment. We can do some work on this image.<br> | ||
[[Image:Scan-16bit-hist-adj-fin.jpg]] | [[Image:Scan-16bit-hist-adj-fin.jpg]] | ||
| Line 37: | Line 39: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[Image:Scan-48bit-image-fin.jpg]]<br><br> | [[Image:Scan-48bit-image-fin.jpg]]<br><br> | ||
| + | Note how robust this image is! We can do a lot to this image without killing it. | ||
[[Image:Scan-48bit-hist-fin.jpg]] | [[Image:Scan-48bit-hist-fin.jpg]] | ||
| + | ==Summary== | ||
| + | Lesson learned. Always use scanner corrections at 48 bit. It really makes a difference. | ||
[[category:photography]] | [[category:photography]] | ||
Revision as of 11:25, 21 November 2006
Recently, I needed to do a bunch of scanning of old photographs for my wife's mother's memorial. I had always been disatisfied with the totally inadequate performance of my HP d135's scanning capabilities. This soley due to the garbage software it comes with. The windows software is almost worse, and an aftermarket alternative software that I had tried (Art-Scan 5) always seemed to crash things or work funky.
Contents
New Scanner
So I say, "That's it. I'm buying a new scanner!" I had owned an HP Scanjet scanner in the past, but I had also been really let down by the software, so I decided that HP was out. I knew that Epson had fairly decent software as my scanner at work had that, but it seemed that Epson was really falling behind in the market these days.
After shopping it through, I decided on a Canon Canoscan 8600F. A $170 scanner that promises slide and negative scanning (surely not as nice as a real slide scanner, but something).
This desision was made for 3 reasons:
- My purchases in the last year of a ton of camera gear centered around a Canon 30D DSLR frame.
- Canon's a solid force in the photocopy image world. (This hopefully atesting to the hardware)
- The product seemed more solid than most others I looked at.
==The Software==My prayer was that the software would be at least much better than the HP garbage. I was rewarded. I am not claiming that the Canon ScanGear software is the best scanning software in the world, but at least I can say that it is truely useful for REAL world scanning.
16 Bit Scan without Scanner Software Levels
The image adjusted with levels.
Note that the image has nothing left. Any work from here will degrade the image.
16 Bit Scan with Scanner Software Levels
The image adjusted with levels.
Note how much image is intact compared to not using the scanner adjustment. We can do some work on this image.
48 Bit Scanning
This is the business. Again. Image was sampled from the scanner at 600x430 (48 bit) with some processing at the scanner, some process in photoshop (levels again), then resampled to 600 pixels wide. Note how much is left to work with.
The image adjusted with levels.
Note how robust this image is! We can do a lot to this image without killing it.
Summary
Lesson learned. Always use scanner corrections at 48 bit. It really makes a difference.
